Journal article
Can the Ethical Best Practice of Shared Decision-Making lead to Moral Distress?
TM Prentice, L Gillam
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | SPRINGER | Published : 2018
Abstract
When healthcare professionals feel constrained from acting in a patient’s best interests, moral distress ensues. The resulting negative sequelae of burnout, poor retention rates, and ultimately poor patient care are well recognized across healthcare providers. Yet an appreciation of how particular disciplines, including physicians, come to be “constrained” in their actions is still lacking. This paper will examine how the application of shared decision-making may contribute to the experience of moral distress for physicians and why such distress may go under-recognized. Appreciation of these dynamics may assist in cross-discipline sensitivity, enabling more constructive dialogue and collabor..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a NHMRC postgraduate research scholarship, GNT1150839. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of the NHMRC.